FFR
Well-known member
Understandably to the average reader, they’d see the 22 vs 21 percent and think “not really a big change or difference”. In reality it is massive.
First, Apple sells nothing but premium except a small percent of SE which is almost premium priced. OTOH Samsung sells a majority of their phones in the budget market. So Samsung may have lost 2% of the entire overall phone market but their loss in premium sales was probably near 10%.
Secondly, these millions of added iPhone users are overwhelmingly going to be ‘for life’. The Apple eco is like the Eagles song Hotel California. “You can check out anytime you like but you can never leave”. Samsung and others do not have the luxury to fall down in the premium market. Once they move to iPhone, it is hell to pay to even have a chance to get them back.
Lastly, see that pic of the throngs at the Apple Store? That’s years of protecting the brandname. That’s years passing up budget TV streaming sticks, 199$ iPhones, 300$ Apple version of Chromebook, 99$ iPad lite as well as an Apple Toothbrush and an Apple Dustbuster. Exclusivity of products, design focused on a small group of products. That gives you a chance at crowds. A toothbrush and vacuum company that also sells 75 smartphone models? Good luck getting a crowd.
I believe samsung shipped 2 million unit less for the quarter, best in mind this is sell-in data and not sell through. It’s been reported Samsung has high inventory levels due to lack of demand.
Quite right, Samsung asp is around $180 vs apple $860.
Back to India the second store opening also drew a large crowd, Samsung employees were notably upset.

iPhone now represents 6% of the market up from 2% and accounts for the majority of revenue share in India. Simply remarkable.


And back to Korea, it seems Apple Pay is taking off much to the dismay of Samsung mobile.
