Sorry if there have been a lot of these threads, but I'm a lifetime Android user looking to make the big switch with concerns over the T-Mobile iPhone 7 Plus with Intel modem.
So is the Intel modem as bad in real world usage? Have some of the reception/bandwidth issues been fixed with an update? Is Bluetooth worse on the Intel modem? Does the Intel modem support EVS? Seems like most of the info bashing the Intel modem comes from the Cellular Insights article and everyone just repeats that study. Have there been other studies conducted? It seems like the point of dropping a bunch of money on Apple is longevity. You keep your phone a long time and get all updates. If a phone has bad reception it doesn't seem like a keeper and defeats the purpose of paying for something that lasts.
I'm so angry with the lack of security on Android phones (five months behind on my supposed flagship) and feel like this is the chance for Apple to win me over. The rumors are the Pixel 2 and Blackberry KEYone may come to T-Mobile, so I feel there is a one month window to win me over (although I have zero brand allegiance -- Apple is fine with me I just haven't seen anything I liked until the last two plus phones).
It seems like the iPhone 7 Plus is the perfect phone other than the possible Intel modem issues. The Pixel could've been the perfect phone if not a Verizon exclusive. The LG V20 would be a perfect phone if it got security updates on all carriers. I don't understand why manufacturers keep making obvious mistakes like this.
Would the iPhone 6s Plus be a better buy? I care most about battery life, reception, security, RAM, speaker quality, and screen. Seems like the iPhone 7 Plus bests the 6s Plus in every category, but I wouldn't have to worry about the Intel modem. I want to be blown away by Apple my first time.
So is the Intel modem as bad in real world usage? Have some of the reception/bandwidth issues been fixed with an update? Is Bluetooth worse on the Intel modem? Does the Intel modem support EVS? Seems like most of the info bashing the Intel modem comes from the Cellular Insights article and everyone just repeats that study. Have there been other studies conducted? It seems like the point of dropping a bunch of money on Apple is longevity. You keep your phone a long time and get all updates. If a phone has bad reception it doesn't seem like a keeper and defeats the purpose of paying for something that lasts.
I'm so angry with the lack of security on Android phones (five months behind on my supposed flagship) and feel like this is the chance for Apple to win me over. The rumors are the Pixel 2 and Blackberry KEYone may come to T-Mobile, so I feel there is a one month window to win me over (although I have zero brand allegiance -- Apple is fine with me I just haven't seen anything I liked until the last two plus phones).
It seems like the iPhone 7 Plus is the perfect phone other than the possible Intel modem issues. The Pixel could've been the perfect phone if not a Verizon exclusive. The LG V20 would be a perfect phone if it got security updates on all carriers. I don't understand why manufacturers keep making obvious mistakes like this.
Would the iPhone 6s Plus be a better buy? I care most about battery life, reception, security, RAM, speaker quality, and screen. Seems like the iPhone 7 Plus bests the 6s Plus in every category, but I wouldn't have to worry about the Intel modem. I want to be blown away by Apple my first time.