Eileen89
Well-known member
Well, please explain to me exactly "how" he was intimidating because I just don't get it, sorry. Let's remember that it was Zimmerman who did the pursuing and not the other way around. If Zimmerman had done as he was told to do and waited for the police to arrive he would not be in the situation that he's in right now.I never said that Trayvon had a gun. You don't need a gun to be intimidating.
Oh, please! I don't like, watch, or listen to any of the crap that ever comes out of that dudes mouth. I know you don't know me, but I'm a hard headed Irish woman who has always formed my own opinions about things and I stand firmly by them too. I''m not one who is influenced by others, trust me.There you go again, assuming that Trayvon was innocent, because that's the way that the media portrayed him. The Police said that the marks on Zimmerman were consistent with somebody who was trying to defend himself. Why do you take the media's side, over that of a Police Surgeon? Don't even tell me that you buy into Rev. Al Sharpton's theory. Check the records of a case from N.Y. Tawana Brawley lied about being beaten and raped by N.Y.C Police Officers. Sharpton and his gang, whipped up a public frenzy against those officers and their families, until it was unsafe for them to stay in the state. Later, Tawana admitted that she made the whole thing up, and the officers were cleared. However, there was never, and still hasn't been an apology from Sharpton.