Sorry! I can't keep up with all the crap you people post here.
Please read my responses.
That doesn't make sense, Wall street is happier in dealing with concrete numbers and products. That is why the SEC filings are broken down as they are to make Wall Street think Apple is more about hardware than software. What you are saying doesn't make sense.
He is definetly not saying that for Wall Street. Wall Street doesn't care about how the user feels with the product. They just care about the number of products.
You're ignoring the fact that they had different wireless chipsets. My information and reasoning is correct.
The Life Drive came out later and used an updated chipset that would allow the 2 wireless techs to be used at the same time.
Oh, and that link you provided doesn't go anywhere.
And yes, I remember the 650 being hacked so that you could use the wi-fi card. But what you are conveniently forgetting is the fact that it rendered everything else useless while using it. WHICH, by the way, verifies my reasoning as you so quoted above.
Finally!
Oh brother. That is what everybody was predicting back then after the Apple/Motorola collaboration with the iTunes phone. I might also note that you put this on the bottom of a long list that you had and it was like a conciliation
You took out the middle which takes away the context. This is what I said:
Anyway, If the cell phone is to overtake the iPod it will certainly take 5 years. But don't you think Apple is prepared for this? I mean jeez, it seems pretty certain that they have an iTunes Mobile that they will be distributing in the coming months to keep those users coming back to the iTMS and assure the continued use of iPods. Some may like the idea of listening to music on the phone. But for most, that will have a limited appeal, with batteries lasting only a few hours.
If you read the full quote, you will see that I said this based on battery life only. So as far as my "batteries lasting very few hours" comment goes I was wrong about that. I of course knew nothing of Apple's use of LLVM in a phone, since it was only developed last year. Thank God Apple can write jaw dropping software like nobody's business.
I'll look for one
Oh really?
This is how it went down according to the NYT and every other paper that I checked.
Wednesday night, in a short, ambiguously worded statement, the companies said they would dismiss all legal action against each other regarding the trademark and that Apple could use the name for its device, which it plans to start selling in June.