Really Sean, I figured if you were going to jump on this bandwagon you'd bring a little more to the table than just reenforcing my point. Stallone, Schwarzenegger and Van Damme are all bad actors that rose to fame simply on the vehicles they were in, rather any skills as actors they possessed. No I don't look for awards when I'm choosing what I view, and listen too. Awards in themselves can be very political and not a end all means for choosing one's entertainment, but it's very seldom that we see a truly bad actor, or show win one.
I was hoping you would retort with this...call it a bit of bait if you will. You call it a vehicle...the movie they were in, and I deduce that you're reflecting that these "actors" are only viewed as good because the movie fits their skill set, correct? Not that they are actually good at acting, but that the movie presents an environment that they find success in?
So what is an actor? What "vehicle" differentiates a good actor from a bad actor? Many people saw Heath Ledger as a bad actor before his depiction of the Joker in The Dark Knight. So if we go by vehicles, bad actors can become good actors in a matter of one film.
To be truthful, this isn't about "vehicles" at all...this is about the appeal of a certain personality that an actor brings to a project. Tom Cruise is a perfect example...he's Tom Cruise in EVERY movie he makes...and people love him because of it. He's fantastic at what he does...and Paul Walker is no different. Type cast? Sure! But to say the guy isn't good at what he does is ridiculous...and what does he do? He acts.
There's no band wagon here that I've jumped on. This is how I feel...whether it's me solo or a thousand other people right behind me. The truth is, you said he wasn't a good actor in a general sense...and in saying such, you were wrong. Not a good actor to you? I'm ok with that, that's an opinion. Not a good actor compared to "X"? Sure! Again, opinions and such. But saying the guy was not good at what he did, and was simply successful because he was in a popular movie is asinine...why? Because he did it again, and again, and again and again...not just in one franchise, but several. He was the likes of James Dean or Steve McQueen in our modern cinema...these are screen legends, and he falls right in line with those types.
Personally, I can't stand Tyler Perry. I think he's a hack personally, and his films are stereotypical junk in my opinion. All that said...I wouldn't even begin to argue he isn't good at what he does. It doesn't appeal to me at all, but I can accept that it's successful work by a person with skills at what he does.