Arizona rep's bill would allow speedy return of child immigrants

pkcable

Q&A Team Leader, VR Expert
Moderator
Jun 16, 2009
5,827
28
0
Visit site
I could go either way on this. I would actually not have much of an issue with placing them with American families either. Why NOT let them live the "American Dream"?
 

the_tech_eater

Well-known member
Jul 24, 2013
3,072
0
0
Visit site
^ I agree. Let them live the American dream----legally! We should secure the boarder and make it easier for them to come over legally.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

HankAZ

Banned
Jul 26, 2012
6,092
0
0
Visit site
Obama seeks 4Billion> I hate CNN.

Yeah, WHAT happened here? Yesterday they were saying BHO wanted TWO billion. Suddenly it’s FOUR? For a crisis that I believe BHO manufactured to create the scenario where he can "fix" this mess. Be afraid, America. Be. Very. Afraid.

Some one suggested approaching Nancy Pelosi and the libs and ask them that since they’re so "touched" by these children, how many of them are each of the libs are willing to take into their home and provide for? Not going to happen. At least not on THEIR dime.
 

hsfof3

Active member
Sep 28, 2013
26
0
0
Visit site
Send them back. If they can't learn to do thing the legal way, they should not be here. Chances are these kids will just be criminals that we will have to pay for the rest of their lives.
2nd we have laws we need to enforce them. You over look one law being broken then you have to over look them all.
 

hydrogen3

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2013
1,056
0
0
Visit site
So...I'm eating lunch at McDonald's today. You know the one between Criswell automotive and the old folk's home. And of course on the giant tv screen is CNN..... The caption read... "Illegal Immigrants have no access to Legal Aid."

Needless to say. I vomited up my lunch! *sigh*
 

HankAZ

Banned
Jul 26, 2012
6,092
0
0
Visit site
So...I'm eating lunch at McDonald's today. You know the one between Criswell automotive and the old folk's home. And of course on the giant tv screen is CNN..... The caption read... "Illegal Immigrants have no access to Legal Aid."

Needless to say. I vomited up my lunch! *sigh*

Don’t you know that the word "illegal" as a descriptive term pertaining to "immigrants" is offensive. (Speaking of CNN). Progressive commentator Sally Kohn said so in her CNN column. She equates the "i-word" to using the "n-word". (Does that mean that if you ARE an illegal, that you ARE allowed to say it?)

Talk about vomiting up your lunch.

Is the ‘I-Word’ the New ‘N-Word’? | TheBlaze.com
 

HankAZ

Banned
Jul 26, 2012
6,092
0
0
Visit site
Obama has time for beer, billiards, bowling, Bronco masks, billionaires, basketball, Bergdahl, and bongs but not the border.

I am so tired of this arrogant, self righteous and pretentious socialist president.
 

the_tech_eater

Well-known member
Jul 24, 2013
3,072
0
0
Visit site
I think the White House should be put to good use since it hasn't been used for anything good since 2008. It could hold a lot of these illegal kids, and Obama's kids can entertain them.
 

the_tech_eater

Well-known member
Jul 24, 2013
3,072
0
0
Visit site
Don?t you know that the word "illegal" as a descriptive term pertaining to "immigrants" is offensive. (Speaking of CNN). Progressive commentator Sally Kohn said so in her CNN column. She equates the "i-word" to using the "n-word". (Does that mean that if you ARE an illegal, that you ARE allowed to say it?)

Talk about vomiting up your lunch.

Is the ?I-Word? the New ?N-Word?? | TheBlaze.com

The new N-word is the M-word. We will not call murders what they are because that is judging them. We want them to feel accepted, and calling them the M-word will hurt their feelings. Bless their little hearts!
 

LordLugard

Active member
Oct 12, 2013
29
0
0
Visit site
Most of you don't realize that the current law on the books signed into law back in '08 (under a different president) forbids the government from deporting minors specifically and immediately without first being processed through HHS, which is why your so called "socialist" and "imperial" president in chief can't just unilaterally order these children deported immediately.

It is also ironic that these same talking heads that are demanding immediate and "unilateral action" by the president are the same ones gung-ho about suing and impeaching him for taking unilateral action on other issues. You can't have it both ways. He's chastised for taking executive actions and being sued (in a shameless political stunt) for doing what he is constitutionally afforded and then being criticized for not doing enough.....bla bla bla...

And let's not forget the theory from the "smartest" governor in the land (Rick "Oops" Perry) that BHO is in cahoots with the current situation of kids and their mothers streaming at our borders, because you know, it somehow makes sense...??!! 😧😧
 

the_tech_eater

Well-known member
Jul 24, 2013
3,072
0
0
Visit site
Most of you don't realize that the current law on the books signed into law back in '08 (under a different president) forbids the government from deporting minors specifically and immediately without first being processed through HHS, which is why your so called "socialist" and "imperial" president in chief can't just unilaterally order these children deported immediately.

It is also ironic that these same talking heads that are demanding immediate and "unilateral action" by the president are the same ones gung-ho about suing and impeaching him for taking unilateral action on other issues. You can't have it both ways. He's chastised for taking executive actions and being sued (in a shameless political stunt) for doing what he is constitutionally afforded and then being criticized for not doing enough.....bla bla bla...

And let's not forget the theory from the "smartest" governor in the land (Rick "Oops" Perry) that BHO is in cahoots with the current situation of kids and their mothers streaming at our borders, because you know, it somehow makes sense...??!!
If he is making executive orders for other things, why isn't he doing it for this issue? All We'er saying is that he needs to do something about it, and that the boarder needs to be secured. And Rick Perry is one of the best governors in history, and would make an awesome president! And I'm sure that this whole crisis is a scheme by the democrats to spend more money. They find anything they can to throw money away with both hands.
 

HankAZ

Banned
Jul 26, 2012
6,092
0
0
Visit site
Most of you don't realize that the current law on the books signed into law back in '08 (under a different president) forbids the government from deporting minors specifically and immediately without first being processed through HHS, which is why your so called "socialist" and "imperial" president in chief can't just unilaterally order these children deported immediately.

It is also ironic that these same talking heads that are demanding immediate and "unilateral action" by the president are the same ones gung-ho about suing and impeaching him for taking unilateral action on other issues. You can't have it both ways. He's chastised for taking executive actions and being sued (in a shameless political stunt) for doing what he is constitutionally afforded and then being criticized for not doing enough.....bla bla bla...

And let's not forget the theory from the "smartest" governor in the land (Rick "Oops" Perry) that BHO is in cahoots with the current situation of kids and their mothers streaming at our borders, because you know, it somehow makes sense...??!! 😧😧

If he is making executive orders for other things, why isn't he doing it for this issue? All We'er saying is that he needs to do something about it, and that the boarder needs to be secured. And Rick Perry is one of the best governors in history, and would make an awesome president! And I'm sure that this whole crisis is a scheme by the democrats to spend more money. They find anything they can to throw money away with both hands.

This (^^^^), plus why are they letting them into the country in the first place? CLOSE THE DAMN BORDER and the problem goes away. Period.