blackmagicwoman
Trusted Member
Everybody knows who he is., Right. Think....Yes it's him again... You recognize his tone and comments.
This is what most people I know are dealing with! What's good about this?
View attachment 78023
Sent from my ancient iPhone 5 (no longer trustworthy)
Comparing two over-reaches of the federal government intruding upon freedom... Net Neutraility is an intrusion onto our liberty. as is the "affordable" care act...I said I'd stay on topic so I'll only address the net neutrality ruling. What didn't you like about the internet over the last 10 years that you feel this ruling changes?
Comparing two over-reaches of the federal government intruding upon freedom... Net Neutraility is an intrusion onto our liberty. as is the "affordable" care act...
The FCC's rules have yet to be made public... We'll see in the coming days...they had to pass it so we the people could see what's in it...Ok, let's discuss that. How does the news today impact your internet experience over the last 10 years in your opinion. I'm asking for specifics on that if you don't mind. I'm also curious if you consider all regulation to be bad. Did you think ma bell should have been broken up for instance?
The FCC's rules have yet to be made public... We'll see in the coming days...they had to pass it so we the people could see what's in it...
Why close it? No one is forcing you to read this thread...Hopefully someone closes this thread. Turning into another crap political post.
This is what most people I know are dealing with! What's good about this?
View attachment 78023
Sent from my ancient iPhone 5 (no longer trustworthy)
Any time government gets bigger is never better...and costs more.
The government that governs least governs best.
See what happens when you have a Community organizer running Government...
Any time government gets bigger is never better...and costs more.
The government that governs least governs best.
Ok. I'll leave this as an open question for those who are bothered by net neutrality. What about keeping the internet the same as it has been since inception is bad? What worries you about that? How is allowing corporations who profit from the change and allowing them to choose what sites can be viewed with normal speeds and what sites can't a good thing? Do those who are against this feel breaking up ma bell was bad or good? Thanks.
Posted via the iMore App for Android
I don't think it's a problem with how the internet will remain with this move...it is the invitation to the government to get involved in something that should have been handled with consumer actions. Now I understand that it was a little different, and that the lack of options to the consumer (for now) was something that was very much a charging point for the government intervention...but where does that stop? If there's something we've seen in the past, it's when you give them an inch, they take 1,000 miles.
I can agree to the apprehension but I view this more along the lines of reasonable regulation. I agree there is unreasonable regulation as well. But this does not seem like that to me. Beside mistrust in government motives do you see anything else nefarious about this?
Posted via the iMore App for Android
Outside of government motive, not really...but asking me that removes a very VERY large reasoning for my caution when it comes to this situation. Kind of like asking someone "Besides the fact that you don't like to eat tacos, why don't you want to eat tacos?"