pretty ****ing convenient Zimmerman is here to tell his story stories but not Trayvon smh
i am having a very difficult time buying into the "self-defense" claim
i am having a very difficult time buying into the "self-defense" claim
pretty ****ing convenient Zimmerman is here to tell hisstorystories but not Trayvon smh
i am having a very difficult time buying into the "self-defense" claim
I am. Stand your ground means that you can shoot someone that threatens or attacks you. He is well in his rights and the trial should prove this n
I don't believe Zimmerman was attacked by Trayvon. That whole argument to me was thrown out the window the minute I heard about Trayvon having only a bag of Skittles in his pocket VS the "GUN" that Zimmerman had..... Zimmerman was told to watch Trayvon from a distance and not confront him, he choose not to do that and instead took the life of a kid. Whether or not Trayvon was innocent or why he was actually out that night we'll never know because he'll never get the chance to tell his side of the story. Sooo sad.
I'm assuming this is sarcasm.He's obviously guilty. He's a non black who shot and killed a black.
Please explain what "pork & beans" blacks are and why are they murderers in comparison to non-pork & beans blacks.Even though in the Pork and Beans blacks shoot and kill blacks almost on an hourly basis, that's fine.
This is what the media thrives on. It sells papers and garner watchers of their weak news programs.But if a black is killed by a non black, he's guilty.
What medical photos?Doesn't matter if the black may or may not have attacked the non black, as medical photos seem to suggest...
Who said that Trayvon had a bag of Skittles? Did anyone actually SEE the bag of Skittles in his pocket? Maybe the story was made up by Al (remember Tawana Brawley) Sharpton?
I'm not getting into this, or i will be banned from these forums
He's obviously guilty. He's a non black who shot and killed a black. Even though in the Pork and Beans blacks shoot and kill blacks almost on an hourly basis, that's fine. But if a black is killed by a non black, he's guilty. Doesn't matter if the black may or may not have attacked the non black, as medical photos seem to suggest...
Doesn't matter if the black may or may not have attacked the non black, as medical photos seem to suggest...
The media showed old photos of Trayvon, trying to paint him as an altar boy. In real life, i believe that he was just another thug, trying to intimidate someone. He picked on the wrong person.
I would have to disagree with you here. I've seen on the news multiple times about the trouble Trayvon got in including this article here. Protesters declare 'I am Trayvon Martin,' but who was he? - CNN.com And while I do not believe this kid was a saint by any means, I think it's important to remember that he was a "kid" and I don't know too many kids that will go through their teenage years without a little trouble every now and then. I know I got into a LOT of trouble between 13 and 19, and I turned out all right. . It's just a shame that Trayvon won't ever get the chance to show how he would have turned out.
Oh, and BTW, going back to the Skittles for a sec. Here is a video that shows the last few moments of Trayvon's life. He went to the store that night and bought an ice tea and the bag of skittles that was found in his pocket that night. Video: Trayvon Martin's last moments | HLNtv.com
He's obviously guilty. He's a non black who shot and killed a black. Even though in the Pork and Beans blacks shoot and kill blacks almost on an hourly basis, that's fine. But if a black is killed by a non black, he's guilty. Doesn't matter if the black may or may not have attacked the non black, as medical photos seem to suggest...