Just like I'll never understand what you hope to gain by trying to convince me to think the way you want me to.
That's what public forums are for; sharing information, asking questions, discussions, debates, and various other types of things.
If you didn't want that, then perhaps public forums aren't for you.
....
I prefer Doritos honestly.
Edit: Sorry, I approach tension with humor... cheesy or not. !
Chipgate was and is blown way out of proportion, just like this discussion.
The behavior of your firmed's iPhone has nothing to do with the Samsung or TSMC SoC inside.how so? my iPhone 6S never overheated and easily gave me a 2 days battery life whereas my friend who had the Samsung CPU in his kept getting overheating issues and bad battery life due to that even after his carrier swapped his phone, he got yet another Samsung CPU based iPhone 6S and continued to have the overheating issue.
There are differences from different batches of the same chip (TSMC or Samsung) bigger than the differences from a sample of the same chip taken from a single manufacturer and another from the other.Everyones experience is unique. What is a fact and has been proven time and time again is that there were differences between the two chips. Small differences, sure. But differences nonetheless. As far as the answer to your question, I don't foresee Apple going the same route. The outcry was pretty loud. I'd imagine they would avoid it if at all possible.
As far as those saying it was "stupid" and "blow out of proportion"...you can't minimize the issues of others just because it worked well for YOU. That's not how problems get solved. As far as I'm concerned if I pay $850 for my phone and my neighbor pays $850 for his phone there should be absolutely NOTHING internally that would result in my phone under performing his by even a fraction. (And it has been proven to have been the case with the differences in chips). It's simply the principle. I pay good money for a company's product, the least that company can do is ensure, based on the hardware used, that their products operate in a similar fashion.
FWIW, despite my disagreement with the whole situation, I've got the Samsung chip in my phone. I haven't experienced any overheating and the phone works just fine for ME. I have NEVER gotten more than a day on my iPhone. Those people getting 2 to 4 days must not be touching their phones, lol. I have no idea have that's possible.
Documented ? Hardly ....Like I've said...personally I don't care about the two chips. My experience has been just fine. I'm not arguing that one is ruining phones while the other is a golden chip. I'm simply stating that there are documented differences between the two.
We don't need anymore threads to argue chips. It's ridiculous!!
My SE has a N69uAP chip, which is made by TSMC. I do not know if Apple has completely changed over to TSMC chip for the SE.
I don't believe they have. My SE had a N69AP chip, which I'm guessing is made by Samsung.
My SE is N69AP...Samsung chip....they're mad at me for getting rid of my Note 5
how so? my iPhone 6S never overheated and easily gave me a 2 days battery life whereas my friend who had the Samsung CPU in his kept getting overheating issues and bad battery life due to that even after his carrier swapped his phone, he got yet another Samsung CPU based iPhone 6S and continued to have the overheating issue.
Tbh, I don't know which chip is better in performance or battery life. My perspective is to not sweat the small stuff and just enjoy the phoneI proudly have the Samsung chip with no issues at all. The whole chip-gate thing was click bate.