I've actually seen a few people around different forums arguing that the iPhone shouldn't have an extra gig of RAM. It mostly comes down to "cost" or "just use your phone the right way" (serious, that was an argument), and the ever famous "the iPhone doesn't need an extra gig of RAM".
That is very much the exception to the norm. Most users welcome higher horse power under the hood of these devices, and they know that they'll eventually get it on all of the devices without big cost bumps each and every year (Apple just happened to focus on running bigger and better processor combos with their hardware and made use of the lower RAM by going the efficiency route).
The difference...most users ALSO don't notice to the little things caused by the smaller horsepower, so telling them that it has 2GB of RAM is like telling them that it has a larger frequency band on the antenna set up. It's kind of just lost in the performance...and if the phone is performing well, most consumers just go about their business.
Was this the optimal choice to appease all consumers? Absolutely not. But trying to make it seem like Apple was making a mistake is just asinine. The iPhones, to this point, satisfied the vast majority of consumers with 1GB of RAM...why would they increase the production cost of the iPhone by adding more RAM when a very high majority of the users were satisfied with what they were offering?
You guys have to understand that we are a small niche of people here on this website talking heavily about specs and functionality on these smart phones. Most people don't give a sh*t. Do I want the most out of my smart phone? Absolutely...and I think it's funny that Syspry said he was seeing apologists here on this forum for the lower specs...that is such a crock of crap. You didn't see apologists, you saw people telling you that the iPhone made efficient use of 1GB of RAM up to this point, and overly satisfied the consumer base that the phone was marketed to...therefore more RAM wasn't a necessity to continue finding major success wit the device.
That obviously won't be the case forever...maybe not even in a month (or so) when the new devices are announced...but up until now, 1GB of RAM served Apple well in the iPhone. Was it perfect? Certainly not...no smart phone is. But calling people explaining this "apologists" is ridiculous. It's just basic logic here boys and girls...I'm not DEFENDING the use of 1GB of RAM, I'm just telling you that there was a justified reasoning for it and that the specs worked more than fine for probably 90%+ of the consumer base.
So let's get over this idea that what we, as forum posters and tech junkies, represent some major push in the market of these devices. There may be some smart phones that are geared towards such users, but the iPhone isn't one of them...nor are any of the other major players in that segment. They are modified, developed and constructed based on the demands of the majority...and when the majority makes waves for some feature, it shows up. That is unquestionably how it works.
Do I want 2GB of RAM? Hell! I want 4GB of RAM, and a slew of other things that most consumers don't give a crap about...but I'm not going to sit here and hold an opinion of Apple or any other tech company out there just because they don't meet my specific demands every single time they release something...I'll just enjoy what I do find attractive, and hope that eventually, I'll get what I want in a single go.