I was going to actually not respond to the guy who called me a troll, and overreacted to my post.
So let me set this straight:
1. I posted that LCD technology (which is what the iPhone 6 uses) are decades behind SAMOLED. Did I even once say it was a bad screen? No. Both phones house easily the two best LCDs available in smartphones. (FYI LCD technology is very old, and very few advancements have been made. Most of the advancements are for cost reduction, not for the quality of panels. (extremely high quality panels, cost the same and are of similar performance to panels from a decade ago).
2. Posted that Note 4's screen was shown to be the most accurate color reproducing screen which is based on measurements via spectroradiometers, as well as controlled variable conditions (lighting in environment, angles, etc). I am afraid for past 3 years, SAMOLED screens have been taking the crown as best displays for mobile phones.
3. Posted why screens may seem saturated which is just poor color management in part of the OS (which Samsung has corrected since the S4 to deadly accuracy on certain a particular screen mode). This is not opinion it's the color management (sRGB vs Adobe RGB gamuts). That's why in applications such as photoshop, or premiere wide color gamut screens (AMOLED for example, or RGB backlit IPS panels) will be most accurate. While outside of those applications while using sRGB gamut, it is shown as saturated.
4. Wider viewing angles with less loss of brightness
I am called a troll for this, over one post which contained factual information, can someone point out where an opinion is this post is? It seems this guy overreacted to my post.
Anyways to conclude: There's a reason why an iPhone 6 is in my pocket, and it isn't because of the screen.
Some info:
Galaxy Note 4 and Note Edge OLED Display Technology Shoot-Out
TFT Central - LCD Monitor Information, Reviews, Guides and News
Let me know if you need other sources.