Umm..i have played around with Macs at the local apple store. What's up with those mice? I'd throw that out in the trash first thing.
And that's the beautiful thing about it, if you don't like the mouse that comes with it - buy something else. But if you are suggesting the mouse design of ANY computer is a show-stopper for you, I think you are a shallow purchaser.
Games? Windows is much better. Programs? Again windows. So i can run Vista on a Mac? So what? I wouldn't buy a Mac to run vista. If i bought a Mac, i'd want nothing to do with Vista. Can you even right click with Macs? I'll stick with Vista.
And console games are better than Windows at gaming. I don't play games on my computer, I use a computer as a tool for work. I use my Xbox and my Wii for playing games - choose the best tool for the job.
As far as other programs, that a bit of personal preference once again. But I have been self-authoring home movies onto DVD since early 2001. Heck I even made some money on the side doing it for other people. There was no PC equivalent software for the price (free), that could do that back then. And the current variations of the commonly used PC programs for the type of work I do as still not as good as the Mac versions - in my opinion.
Running Windows on a Mac - the reason why this is nice is that if there is a specific program you absolutely MUST run in a Windows environment, you can now do on a Mac, while still having access to Mac OS for the majority of the computer use.
As far as right-clicking, yes you can on a Mac - even with the one button Mac mice, but the true beauty of the OS is that you don't have to. Right-clicking to a native Mac user would be as odd to a PC user as having to pick your laptop up and shake it upside down in order to close a window. You could do it - by why would you build your user interface around it?
However, I'll take an iphone or ipod. Great stuff. But I really don't see the appeal of a Mac computer. I'll admit that the simplicity and elegance of the iphone made me look at what they might be doing in the computer department. And Apple knows how to market.
Here we are of a different opinion as well. I wont switch to an iPhone until it has some additional functionality, and will run on a CDMA network. I have an iPod and use it infrequently because when I'm heading out the door and can only bring one device along with me for entertainment, my PSP plays music, videos, games, and can browse the internet in a WiFi location.
It's the simplicity and elegance of the Mac desktop which keeps me purchasing them for personal use. I was a government employee for many years, and as such was forced to use Windows based computers at work. And like the poster above said, the Chevy for 1/3 (its not really 1/3 the price when you compare actual specifications) the price got me where I needed to go at work, but when I'm at home, I want a smoother, nicer ride. So I'll pay for a new Mac every couple of years. I would HOPE my government would not spend that kind of money every few years when it comes to computer replacement time.
But if price was the only factor to consider, Apple wouldn't ahve sold over a million iPhones, and who knows how many iPods to date. Because the "free" phone with a 2 year contract is always cheaper that whatever cost they are charging now for an iPhone, and a free AM/FM radio with your paid subscription to Sports Illustrated can let you listen to music for a lot less than the cheapest iPod.