Would be an interesting experiment. "touch the letter" takes the same amount of time, in theory, as typing the first letter.
After that, the drag/flick would take somewhere around the effort of typing another letter or two.
I'd prefer a typing interface, but not sure the letter-bar is that much worse for most people. (once you get around 100 contacts per a letter, the iphone method gets ugly.)
mobileman,
Steve Job's couldn't think of another exposed keyboard device other than the Treo...he could think of 3...(BB, Q, and Nokia).
Can't believe you said that...but then again, the rolodex was lost on you.
Flick and spins work great...until you have thousands of contacts (which is not that rare in today's world.
I'm convinced at least some iPhone users are retards Just because you are happy with it doesn't make you one though.
I've used both. I actually got to use an iPhone for a full day recently.
In theory and practice, the type-to-contact is MUCH faster.
Now, in terms of what is better for most people, that's easy - whatever Apple says is easier.
If your device has an exposed keyboard, searching contacts would be much faster. Any other device (with keyboard or not), I cant really see how its any faster.
Surely an 'exposed' soft keyboard would be similarly faster, and would allow searching through all the contact fields, not just the name.
Imagine this hypothetical time (feel free to modify if the times appear wrong)
Open app
keyboard already on screen.
tap the first 4 letters of the name - 4 seconds.
tap on the contact to dial.1
Total 5 seconds
vs.
Open
Press the letter you want. 1
scroll through the list, which could be one screen or 3-4 screens. 0-20 seconds
tap on the contact to dial. 1
Total 2 to 22 seconds
The first seems more predictable, and will on average probably be faster.
Surur
i wouldn't even mind if they did it the "iphone way" and put a searchbox at the top of the screen, and didn't pop up the keyboard until you tapped inside the box.
not that it matters, but I can't think of another commercially avaible device in the U.S. With an exposed keyboard.
I guess the fact that I was referring to Windows Mobile devices (non smartphone edition) was lost on you. If I wanted to use a device without a touchscreen, it would be a blackberry.
From http://www.bbspot.com/News/2007/07/apple-store-to-being-charging-entrance-fee.htmlCupertino, CA – If you want to see the iPhone at an Apple store, be sure to bring some cash. Large crowds flocking to see the iPhone and next generation iPods have forced Apple to begin charging a $5 entrance fee for Apple stores. Many analysts anticipated the move, and expect a positive response from customers.
"Part of the move was to limit crowds to keep the stores safe, but also we wanted to keep the right kind of people in the stores," said vice president of retail outlets, Vince Sciopiano. "By 'right kind of people' I mean true Apple customers with money, willing to pay just to look at our newest wares."
While Apple Geniuses patrol inside the store, Apple "Muscleheads" will guard the window displays and entrances.
For the $5 fee, customers will get an Apple button which will allow them entrance into the store and is used to track the customer's movements. Sciopiano noted that the $5 fee could be applied to purchases on that visit
Customer reaction at a pilot project at the Apple Store in Canoga Park, California was positive. Alexander Hu, an avid Mac user, said, "I don't mind paying $5 to get into the store, if it keeps out the iPhone gawkers and Windows lusers who want to drool over the new Macs."
Not everyone was pleased though. Kyle Martin said, "Five dollars to just walk into the store? It's like they want to be elite snobs or something."
When told of the criticism, Sciopiano said, "That's exactly the case."
The above quote did not reference WM only devices. Before you decide something is "lost" on someone, maybe you should be more specific.
There's the JAQ3 and upcoming JAQ4 as well.
Are these commercially available in the U.S. through normal supply chains. I order all handheld devices for my company. We give our employees the option of tmobile, verizon, or AT&T. Ordering the JAQ3 through an internet supplier is not an option in corporate America.
Surur, the HP device that you posted is no longer being offered (at least that I can find, or my AT&T rep can find) through business channels. Anyway, I hated that device. It had a nice big screen screen, but the resolution was still 240x240. Another thing that I found interesting talking to my AT&T guy is how bad he says the treo 750 is selling compared to the 8525.
In your version of corporate American, it may not be possible. But for many companies, if it's sold, you can buy it.
MobilePlanet still offers it.
Surur, the HP device that you posted is no longer being offered (at least that I can find, or my AT&T rep can find) through business channels. Anyway, I hated that device. It had a nice big screen screen, but the resolution was still 240x240. Another thing that I found interesting talking to my AT&T guy is how bad he says the treo 750 is selling compared to the 8525.
Its still on the site at the link I gave. Did you dial 1 866 429-7222 to check? Not that I am trying to sell it to you, its certainly an older device now. I would not mind an update with similar updated features and better design however. This device from ASUS for example.
http://www.theunwired.net/?itemid=4010
with QVGA screen HSDPA, SIRF III GPS and 3.2 megapixel camera would be quite nice.
However, an Iphone I am sure is a better iPod/Web surfing device. I would actually argue that this device is a better business phone however, due to hard dial pad, WM6 exchange integration and security features, and GPS, which could orientate a lost business man.
Surur
Nice specs. Is it a slider?This device from ASUS for example.
with QVGA screen HSDPA, SIRF III GPS and 3.2 megapixel camera would be quite nice.