Incorrect info and not understanding technology, huh?
Hey remember when you insisted that I was incorrect in Apple being primarily a software company and you were the one that knew what he was talking about because you knew that Apple was a hardware company. Then I gave my evidence and proof but you still discounted it.
Did you see D:All Things Digital?
Steve said "Apple views itself as a software company." Steve then repeats to Walt Mossberg after he questions it, "Apple is fundamentally a software company."
How about that time I said the Treo 650 would never have wi-fi and gave clear reasoning as to why, but you kept pushing the entire TreoCentral board to donate money to write a driver to get it to work. Year or 2 later, we find out my resons were correct.
How bout that time you disagreed with my view point of the iPod being a household name like Jeep or Jacuzzi. You of course insisted that it wasn't ever going to be a household name (then you said it wouldn't last 5 years).
Hey, remember when you new what you were talking about in regards to Grid computing and how Apple did not use it for anything; especially the iTunes Store. HAHAHAHAHA!
Or how about the Cisco/Apple case where you predicted Apple would walk away with their tail between their legs, assuming they still had one... because Cisco would shove it so far up Apple's *** you could never find it. or something like that.
Archie,
You shouldn't lie/misrepresent - I will respond with fact and honesty.
1.) Apple is a hardware company, no matter what Steve says (he says that for Wall Street). They make most of their money from hardware THEY MAKE and services LOCKED to their solution. This is obvious. I did not discount any evidence you provided - it just doesn't change how Apple makes money.
2.) Re: Wi-fi on the 650, you said in 10/2004:
(begin Archie quote)
"Here is why I believe that the 650 will not support the PalmOne WiFi Board.
The Treo 650 comes with Garnet (5.4). That is why the Treo will not have Wi-Fi capability.
Let me explain.
Palm only licensed Bluetooth for Cobalt. Garnet is using the 4 year old Bluetooth technology that Palm licensed a couple years ago. This means the phone will not have Bluetooth technology that is capable of working with Wi-Fi; hence, no wi-fi on the Treo 650.
(end Archie quote)
First, this is patently false. In fact, you show how little you understand technology, as you believe that BT 1.2 was required to have Wi-Fi also work on a device. Garnet 5.4 did not exclude BT 1.1 and Wi-Fi. It actually worked and was released as a product.
Need some proof? I guess the Palm KB on the LifeDrive will do:
http://kb.palmone.com/SRVS/CGI-BIN/...SupportKB,ts=Palm_External2001,case=obj(39318)
And by the way, people did hack the 650 and get it to work with Wi-Fi cards.
3.) Re: Ipod household name, I will say that today, it is. I am surprised how poorly the rest of the market responded to Apple, and give Apple kudos for their iPod development. I still say it's like Tivo - a tech trend word. Will is last 10, 20, 50 years? Let's see. I never said it wouldn't last 5 years...I said call me in 2010 and let's see where the iPod is. That's all.
I also said in 9/2004: "Apple - laugh, but they could build the next cool converged device." So I predicted the iPhone in even way back then, but I saw no affirmation from you.
And your quotes from 05/2005:
(begin Archie quote)
"...If the cell phone is to overtake the iPod it will certainly take 5 years... Some may like the idea of listening to music on the phone. But for most, that will have a limited appeal, with batteries lasting only a few hours.
(end Archie quote)
Hmmmm...looks like it will not take 5 years...the iPhone will eclipse the iPod sooner than that. And I guess listening to music on a phone has limited appeal; you were a regular Nostradamus on that...
4.) Grid computing - let's not even go there. Please show me a defintion that says iTunes is grid computing. SETI@Home, sure, but not iTunes.
5.) Re: Cisco/Apple case, I never said Apple would walk away or anything you quoted above. All I said was Cisco had a case. They settled out of court and got paid, and got to use the iPhone term as well.
So now that the facts are out, you can go back (humiliated) to your Mac and type up some more lies.