Its from the last Engadget Podcast. They do not give any details.
Thanks. That'll be the one I fell asleep listening to
Its a pity MS will be accused of copying Apple when they have been showing around the OS for a long time now.
I don't think any sensible observer will accuse them of copying unless it becomes known (from those who've seen a preview) that it's changed to be much more iPhone-like since it was last shown.
It does not have to be an exact copy, just software with a similar level of pizazz.
So nicer graphical abilities, prettier icons, transitions, animations, etc? I hope so. I've used Palm OS, WM5 (not for very long), and S60 in the last few months and they all look rather dull and sterile (not to mention cluttered, messy and just plain ugly) compared to what we've seen so far of the iPhone UI. But really that's not the most important thing to my mind:
I think the finger based UI is bunk in any case.
I think the finger-based UI is the most distinctive and radical thing about the iPhone. It's a bold move for sure. The question is, is it any good?
I've been trying to think about this by trying to think of similar things I've used in the past. There aren't a lot, but the one that first comes to mind is TomTom on the Treo 650. The UI for this app replicates that of the company's personal navigation devices, which is designed to be navigated by tapping the touch-screen with a finger while in a car. Although I disliked the fact that this form of input was completely different to everything else on the 650, I found the 'tap a big icon with a finger' input to be extremely efficient and easy to do. I particularly liked it that options are visible on the screen and not hidden way in an invisible menu. In the car the device is mounted on the dash, but even holding the 650 I had no problem using most of the TomTom functions one-handed (tapping the icons with a a thumb). So, the icon/onscreen button tapping thing on the iPhone should be just fine (for me at least).
Of course, there is more to finger input on the iPhone than just tapping icons and it's not clear how easy other aspects will be. Scrolling I'd guess will be fine (actually, I think from what we've seen it looks really good). Similarly the zoom in, zoom out, pinch gesture thing looks very sweet, but how about:
1) Picking out a link on a web page, especially when there are other links nearby (for instance the page navigation links, < 1 2 3 > etc, in a forum like this)? You'd have to imagine that this would be difficult.* Apple may well be able to make every option in every one of their apps to be tappable or gesture controllable but they certainly can't control the content of every web page.
2) Entering text without tactile feedback? Will it really be able to compete with a physical QWERTY keyboard? Only time will tell but it may well be that this device isn't for those who enter lots of text. Still, unless it's truly terrible it should be much better than T9.
3) Moving around entered text to make edits? If you have to precisely tap the point of the edit, this could be awful. On the other hand, if there's some clever way to move though text using scroll-like gestures this could be very quick and intuitive.
4) Deleting a word in text? Highlighting text, copying and pasting? Again, this could be good or bad depending on how well it's implemented.
Just because Jobs is doing it does not mean everyone should copy him.
Whether copying is desirable or not rather depends on how well Apple have executed. I don't sensibly see how we can judge this at this time.
EDIT: *I guess to some extent this depends on how much zooming the ZUI allows. Even if it's a lot though having to zoom for each and every closely-packed link would still seem to be a pain.