Originally Posted by
Darthgreg I, for one, think the naming makes perfect sense. Outside of my geek friends, nobody I know understands the nomenclature of ipad vs. ipad 2 or iphone 4 vs 4s. They are sometimes aware that there is a new device out, sometimes being the key word), but are absolutely oblivious to the naming system and specs. This naming system makes sense for 90% of the population. You either have the new iPad or an old one. Numbers really dont mean anything. Next year we will get a new iPad, and you will once again either have the new iPad, or an old one. It's that simple.
I don't agree. That worked for pc devices. But this is a post pc device. These are more personal. And let's not forget one of the factors that has led people to buy iDevices. They want to stand out, impress their peers, be proud of their device.
Remember people's reaction to the 4S even though it was a solid upgrade? Disappointment. Yet, Siri saved the day because they could use that to stand out.
It doesn't take much from Apple here. You spent the last few years driving expectations with numbers after the name. Then abandon it. To me, it shows uncertainty, diminishing future upgrades, and a lack of understanding of what has drove idevice sales.
Let the results be the judge of what naming mechanism was working best for each product. Mac sales? ipod sales? or ipad & iphone sales?