Anybody planning to buying at launch only to sell at a markup? Is that wrong?

jean15paul

Trusted Member
Jul 5, 2012
186
0
0
Visit site
For whatever it's worth, I was trying to look up an "official" definition of scalping since there's been some debate, and it seems it's not so narrowly defined. Some jurisdictions define scalping as reselling tickets for more than their original purchase price, but others define it as any unauthorized ticket resale.

Thoughts?
 

Ipheuria

Well-known member
Jul 21, 2009
7,356
239
0
Visit site
OK the 128GB iPad Air costs $929 yet it cost Apple according to estimates $361 to make. So Apple is taking a product and using people's wants to sell it at markup. So by Scatabrain's reasoning this is wrong?
 

Scatabrain

Well-known member
Nov 15, 2010
1,728
1
0
Visit site
To clarify what i thought was obvious. For me if something sucks to do to someone the for me, it's wrong. And this is more parsing words and others incorrectly comparing what an original manufacturer - selling direct - to consumers. Others selling on ebay are mucking the process up.


Sent from my iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk
 

HankAZ

Banned
Jul 26, 2012
6,092
0
0
Visit site
To clarify what i thought was obvious. For me if something sucks to do to someone the for me, it's wrong. And this is more parsing words and others incorrectly comparing what an original manufacturer - selling direct - to consumers. Others selling on ebay are mucking the process up.

Reselling for a profit is NOT doing anything to anyone. If I have an Watch listed on eBay, regardless of the price, I am not forcing you to do anything. If I am selling, you have the choice to buy or not. I am selling you my Watch with the convenience of getting it NOW as opposed to waiting 6 weeks or 6 months. No one is mucking up the process.

Everything has a price. That price is payable in terms of money, time or effort.

You still have not presented a valid argument.
 

anon(4698833)

Banned
Sep 7, 2010
12,010
187
0
Visit site
Sean, now do you get it? You don't have to agree but now can you admit that I have a point of view and maybe even a basis for it?

BTW: I have a 4/24 ship date. I don't expect any favors from anyone. I also don't choose to interfere with others. What the heck is wrong with that? It was probably useless name calling for humor but I bet some cheered and said - yeah so entitled.




Sent from my iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

No...I do not admit that you have a point because you DON'T. You've back tracked and changed your argument now...the reason this entire debate started is because you assigned the term "scalper" to ANYONE that sold the product after release for more than retail cost, and THAT is what I objected to.

Are there people who buy up stock only to make a buck on EVERY unit they bought? Sure! And as it has been said, Apple has taken steps to deter this behavior, even if it is perfectly legal to do.

Is EVERY person that sells their device after release for a profit one of these "scalpers"? Absolutely NOT.

And that is where the problem occurred...YOU said the two are exactly the same, and I said that is absolutely asinine because when I buy a product for myself, how is it "wrong" for me to decide to sell it to a person who is desperate enough to pay more than it's retail cost to have it immediately?

You over generalized and I called you on it...you backed off and now you've changed your tune and you're focusing on the people who buy multiple units SOLELY for resale during the initial release profit spike. That is why I said you have no legitimate argument for what I've said...you've changed direction.
 

Just_Me_D

Ambassador Team Leader, Senior Moderator
Moderator
Jan 8, 2012
59,780
645
113
Visit site
....No one on a forum is ever going to convince another person that they are wrong. ...

I'm not sure I agree. The hard part is getting the person to convince himself that he is wrong when he or she knows the evidence supports it....
 

anon(4698833)

Banned
Sep 7, 2010
12,010
187
0
Visit site
To clarify what i thought was obvious. For me if something sucks to do to someone the for me, it's wrong. And this is more parsing words and others incorrectly comparing what an original manufacturer - selling direct - to consumers. Others selling on ebay are mucking the process up.


Sent from my iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Explain how it is "mucking the process up". What SPECIFICALLY is it mucking up for the end user?
 

Premium1

Trusted Member
Aug 17, 2011
3,610
43
0
Visit site
Explain how it is "mucking the process up". What SPECIFICALLY is it mucking up for the end user?

Maybe taking one away from someone who actually wants it to wear and not just sell? And now that said person will have to wait longer? That's the only thing I could see them saying.
 

Beyond Fire

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2012
459
0
0
Visit site
Maybe taking one away from someone who actually wants it to wear and not just sell? And now that said person will have to wait longer? That's the only thing I could see them saying.

Even if every single in person in line bought one for the sole purpose of actually using it and not to sell for a profit. There are still gonna be ppl who waited in line for hours that will not have gotten one. It doesn't change anything.


Sent from my Golden Apple Six
 

Premium1

Trusted Member
Aug 17, 2011
3,610
43
0
Visit site
Even if every single in person in line bought one for the sole purpose of actually using it and not to sell for a profit. There are still gonna be ppl who waited in line for hours that will not have gotten one. It doesn't change anything.


Sent from my Golden Apple Six

It does when 5 min after preorders open the wait time was a month or longer..


Sent from my iPhone using tapatalk
 

anon(4698833)

Banned
Sep 7, 2010
12,010
187
0
Visit site
Maybe taking one away from someone who actually wants it to wear and not just sell? And now that said person will have to wait longer? That's the only thing I could see them saying.

Do they not have the same opportunity to pre-order or get in line for the product that everyone else has? In the years that I've pre-ordered these products or got in line to get them on release day, I've been successful in doing so with little more than the effort on my part to stay up or show up when I needed to to get the product.
 

Ledsteplin

Ambassador
Oct 2, 2013
50,267
707
108
Visit site
I wear hearing aids. It costs the manufacturer $80 to produce a premium quality hearing aid. They sell it to the retailer/Audiologist for $1,000. The retailer sells it to the consumer for $3,000. Is that wrong? No, it's not. I hate it though, because insurance pays nothing on hearing aids.


Sent from my ancient but trustworthy iPhone 5. ☮
 

jean15paul

Trusted Member
Jul 5, 2012
186
0
0
Visit site
I wear hearing aids. It costs the manufacturer $80 to produce a premium quality hearing aid. They sell it to the retailer/Audiologist for $1,000. The retailer sells it to the consumer for $3,000. Is that wrong? No, it's not. I hate it though, because insurance pays nothing on hearing aids.


Sent from my ancient but trustworthy iPhone 5. ☮

Insurance. There's a scam right there. ;)
 

SwitchBeach

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2013
2,968
6
38
Visit site
To clarify what i thought was obvious. For me if something sucks to do to someone the for me, it's wrong. And this is more parsing words and others incorrectly comparing what an original manufacturer - selling direct - to consumers. Others selling on ebay are mucking the process up.

The point that you are STILL missing is that everyone had the exact same opportunity to get up early (or stay up) and order the watch if they chose to do so.
Everyone STILL has the same opportunity to order the watch today and WAIT for it to ship.

No one has deprived anyone of this opportunity.

Would it be any different to you if those same people who "snatched up" all the watches did so with the intention of keeping them rather than potentially selling them? If so, how would this be any different as an end result? The same number of watches would have been sold and the same number would be available (or unavailable) to the next potential purchasers.

So what difference does it make what the initial purchasers intend to do with the watches? No one is being forced to by on eBay either way.
 

Scatabrain

Well-known member
Nov 15, 2010
1,728
1
0
Visit site
The point that you are STILL missing is that everyone had the exact same opportunity to get up early (or stay up) and order the watch if they chose to do so.
Everyone STILL has the same opportunity to order the watch today and WAIT for it to ship.

No one has deprived anyone of this opportunity.

Would it be any different to you if those same people who "snatched up" all the watches did so with the intention of keeping them rather than potentially selling them? If so, how would this be any different as an end result? The same number of watches would have been sold and the same number would be available (or unavailable) to the next potential purchasers.

So what difference does it make what the initial purchasers intend to do with the watches? No one is being forced to by on eBay either way.

When the scalpers game it that's not right. A normal consumer doesn't stand a chance. Most people aren't like me prepared at 3am.


Sent from my iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk
 

anon(4698833)

Banned
Sep 7, 2010
12,010
187
0
Visit site
When the scalpers game it that's not right. A normal consumer doesn't stand a chance. Most people aren't like me prepared at 3am.


Sent from my iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

I'm a normal consumer...I've yet to miss out on getting a new Apple product on release day. I'd say I've stood a perfectly fair chance each and every year...just like anyone else has the opportunity to.

You've also avoided the point as you have through this entire thread. At least you're consistent with that!
 

jean15paul

Trusted Member
Jul 5, 2012
186
0
0
Visit site
I'm a normal consumer...I've yet to miss out on getting a new Apple product on release day. I'd say I've stood a perfectly fair chance each and every year...just like anyone else has the opportunity to.

You've also avoided the point as you have through this entire thread. At least you're consistent with that!
Nobody regularly participating in the iMore forums is a normal consumer. You're an enthusiast. We all are.
 

anon(4698833)

Banned
Sep 7, 2010
12,010
187
0
Visit site
Nobody regularly participating in the iMore forums is a normal consumer. You're an enthusiast. We all are.

I disagree. Just because a person is an educated consumer doesn't prevent them from also being normal. To me, a normal consumer is one who follows the common trend to purchase whatever product they are interested in. I don't buy every item Apple makes...I only buy what works for me (which turns out to be the iPhone and MBP series of computers for me)...my wife liked the watch so I stayed up to pre-order it, like any other normal consumer could do.

Truth is...I don't see being an enthusiast and a consumer as mutual events, so while I may be an Apple product enthusiast, I don't feel it changes my habits or characteristics as a consumer at all, especially since 75% of the stuff Apple makes I don't actually CONSUME.
 

Trending Posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
260,332
Messages
1,766,448
Members
441,237
Latest member
INTERNET BUNDLE NOW