I must admit. I'm surprised to see more people arguing that it's ok to sell for profit than people arguing against it. I would have thought more people would have disliked that behavior.
I must admit. I'm surprised to see more people arguing that it's ok to sell for profit than people arguing against it. I would have thought more people would have disliked that behavior.
Business men think alike
I must admit. I'm surprised to see more people arguing that it's ok to sell for profit than people arguing against it. I would have thought more people would have disliked that behavior.
I think everyone in this thread thinks it sucks. Most of us just don't think it's wrong. Demand is higher than supply and so pushes the price up. Basic economics. And since this watch epitomizes a want not a need, I see nothing morally wrong with it.
You just buried yourself here with this one sentence...lol. You cannot hold this stance in this scenario without applying it across the board to like scenarios...otherwise you're holding a double standard. In the same way you can find another mechanic, if you don't like the pricing of a release day watch, you purchase the watch in another fashion (IE: directly from Apple, with whatever wait time comes with such).
Thank you for making the comment that I quoted above...at least I know that even you know your argument holds no water, and that you're simply defending your initial stance out of stubbornness and nothing else.
Is that true? BreakingKayfabe, Ipheuria, SeanHRCC do you think it sucks? I only single yall out because yall were the main ones arguing that it's ok (but everyone can chime in). Just curious to get clarity.
Is that true? BreakingKayfabe, Ipheuria, SeanHRCC do you think it sucks? I only single yall out because yall were the main ones arguing that it's ok (but everyone can chime in). Just curious to get clarity.
There is on release date Sean. You don't have a choice to get on release date. If scalpers hogged up all the stock we'd all agree. Now you have me repeating myself. This discussion is going nowhere.
Sent from my iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk
Is that true? BreakingKayfabe, Ipheuria, SeanHRCC do you think it sucks? I only single yall out because yall were the main ones arguing that it's ok (but everyone can chime in). Just curious to get clarity.
Guess that's the difference. I thinks its wrong because it sucks.
Thanks for pointing that out. So many have said so much that I forgot you said that.Scroll back up and look at some of my comments. I already said that we all think it sucks we just don't think it's wrong.
There are a lot of things that may "suck" but are not necessarily "wrong".
It might "suck" that that it has rained for 5 straight days. But that doesn't mean that it is "wrong".
It might "suck" that the Apple Watch costs $349 (to start). But that doesn't mean that it is "wrong".
It might "suck" that your favorite basketball team got eliminated from the playoffs in January. But that doesn't make it "wrong".
It might "suck" that it gets cold in the winter in Boston. But that doesn't make it "wrong".
Your rationale is flawed.
I've said it already and I'll say it again. The buyers are the ones who create the market. If there were no people to buy at the marked up price there would be no sellers. I will always stand by the fact that every person works for their own money. They spend it how they see fit because it is theirs. No one, not me, not you has the right to ever tell someone how to spend their money. So if a person would pay $200 over cost simply because they can't wait a month or two explain to me how it's wrong for a person to sell it to them. The simple fact is and someone asked it before. If the sellers were selling at a loss I wonder if the people who think it's wrong would still feel so then? I'm willing to bet not.
As a side-note: I tried to watch The Wire and I couldn't get past the 2nd episode. Just unbearable to watch.
I actually watched it all and enjoyed it. I don't have any law enforcement background though. I'm guessing that makes a difference.