Does anyone wish that there was a camera?

[dpham00]

I had a camera on my gear and gear 2 and used it occasionally. Though my gear fit and currently my LG G Watch do not have cameras. It is nice especially when you want to take pictures discreetly, though not a deal breaker. What about you? How much do you care about a camera on a smart watch?

 

[Winston Loh]

I think Apple will keep the camera for the next upgrade of the iwatch... ;-)

 

[Ipheuria]

NO! lol that's just personal but I find the camera on watches stupid. I hated that in the commercial for the Samsung watch. A camera for FaceTime calls feels like the future but battery life means that's years away.

 

[ame]

No. Not really.

 

[metllicamilitia]

Not really, just seems awkward and little too James Bond. I would also not be able to wear it at work. I'm surprised they allow phones due to the cameras. It's all secrety hush hush where I work.

 

[SpookDroid]

Not really miss it on my current watch, but it's always cool to have extra features. I feel it would make this one too bulky though (like it was with the Gear), but most of all, I'm concerned about the amount of creeps that would use a camera in their watches for a whole different purpose than impromptu pictures :S hahaha

 

[dpham00]

I think Apple will keep the camera for the next upgrade of the iwatch... ;-)

I wouldn't be surprised if it came in a later generation. I think, as watches become more mainstream, and if someday, the watch could work on it's own without an iPhone;

 

[Premium1]

I had a camera on my gear and gear 2 and used it occasionally. Though my gear fit and currently my LG G Watch do not have cameras. It is nice especially when you want to take pictures discreetly, though not a deal breaker. What about you? How much do you care about a camera on a smart watch?

Not really.

 

[dpham00]

Not really.

Let's say that Apple offered one with a camera, for $50 more. Would you go for it?

 

[Premium1]

Let's say that Apple offered one with a camera, for $50 more. Would you go for it?

Nope. Wouldn't use a camera so not worth the $50 more.


Sent from my iPhone using tapatalk

 

[dpham00]

Nope. Wouldn't use a camera so not worth the $50 more.


Sent from my iPhone using tapatalk

Not even for FaceTime or something like that?

 

[Premium1]

Not even for FaceTime or something like that?

Nope. Battery wouldn't last long enough for anything like that, so not worth it IMO


Sent from my iPhone using tapatalk

 

[dpham00]

Nope. Battery wouldn't last long enough for anything like that, so not worth it IMO


Sent from my iPhone using tapatalk

Good point. Hopefully in a future gen, battery life would improve a lot.

 

[dfb8085]

Not really. I'm getting sick of so much coming out these days with everybody carrying a phone with a camera and shooting video. My goodness you can't do anything without fear somebody just happens to have a camera.

 

[Just_Me_D]

Nope. I do not want to see a camera on the  Watch.

 

[John Yester]

No need for a camera. So no


But I do like the extra functionality of it integrating with the iPhone

 

[Sammuel1973]

No. A camera seems too creepy.

Ha, only creepy people have creepy thoughts.

Unless one must be super hot.

 

[Bigeric23]

Not, not at all. I think a camera on a watch in not a practical idea.

 

[dpham00]

Not really. I'm getting sick of so much coming out these days with everybody carrying a phone with a camera and shooting video. My goodness you can't do anything without fear somebody just happens to have a camera.

I don't think that is necessarily a bad thing...I think it keeps people more in check.

 

[boovish]

Well, the pin connector on the bottom band holder suggests there may be something like that. If Samsung had kept the camera on their galaxy gear's watch band, I would've bought one.