HankAZ
Banned
Again, the assumption is that torturing means you'll get credible and useful information. The studies show he opposite, most anyone under torture will say whatever you want them to say.
Moreover, you are assuming hey are guilty , it's a very slippery slope.
So, the CIA torturing captured terrorists to get useful information is wrong. But Obama ordering drone strikes that kill entire households or even entire villages is ok when the result is annihilation of a bad guy leader? For the sake of political correctness, let’s call that a "subtle inconsistency". Either the end justifies the means or it doesn't.
Last edited: