Why is the climate change debate a political one in the United States?

HankAZ

Banned
Jul 26, 2012
6,092
0
0
Visit site
What science? The mean temperature of the planet has not risen in 18 years. Experts are fearing a "crisis of credibility". In other news, Al Gore continues to preach this lie, get rich, and continue to burn fossil fuel in direct opposition to the tenets of the "gospel" that he is preaching. Al Gore is just another hypocrite.

'Where's The Global Warming?' Expert Says Public Are Growing Skeptical Of Climate Change - Fox Nation
Prison Planet.com » ‘Where’s the global warming?’ Expert says public are growing sceptical of climate change
The great global warming collapse - The Globe and Mail
Global warming is not a crisis
The Crisis of Fake Global Warming « The Burning Platform

Shall I continue?
 

kilofoxtrot

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2011
1,204
36
0
Visit site
What science? The mean temperature of the planet has not risen in 18 years. Experts are fearing a "crisis of credibility". In other news, Al Gore continues to preach this lie, get rich, and continue to burn fossil fuel in direct opposition to the tenets of the "gospel" that he is preaching. Al Gore is just another hypocrite.

'Where's The Global Warming?' Expert Says Public Are Growing Skeptical Of Climate Change - Fox Nation
Prison Planet.com » ‘Where’s the global warming?’ Expert says public are growing sceptical of climate change
The great global warming collapse - The Globe and Mail
Global warming is not a crisis
The Crisis of Fake Global Warming « The Burning Platform

Shall I continue?

Wow... Fox Nation, Prisonplanet, The Globe and Mail, Ukessays, The Burning Platform.

Bastions of truth.

I will take your "sources" and raise you with.... oh... lets try NASA.

Global Warming : Feature Articles

ipcc_scenarios.png

As far as Al Gore getting rich..... when it comes to $$$$$$$ which figure is higher? The money Gore stands to make or the money oil companies stand to lose?

I will agree money is the issue...... but Oil > Gore.
 

Les74

Well-known member
May 30, 2011
1,000
0
0
Visit site
Wow... Fox Nation, Prisonplanet, The Globe and Mail, Ukessays, The Burning Platform.

Bastions of truth.

I will take your "sources" and raise you with.... oh... lets try NASA.

Global Warming : Feature Articles

View attachment 67474

As far as Al Gore getting rich..... when it comes to $$$$$$$ which figure is higher? The money Gore stands to make or the money oil companies stand to lose?

I will agree money is the issue...... but Oil > Gore.

Yeah, I'll take the word of NASA over those other "publications."
 

hydrogen3

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2013
1,056
0
0
Visit site
NASA? Lol nothing but political propaganda.......


?global warming? is a scare tactic being used to manipulate the population
 

HankAZ

Banned
Jul 26, 2012
6,092
0
0
Visit site
Wow... Fox Nation, Prisonplanet, The Globe and Mail, Ukessays, The Burning Platform.

Bastions of truth.

I will take your "sources" and raise you with.... oh... lets try NASA.

Global Warming : Feature Articles

View attachment 67474

As far as Al Gore getting rich..... when it comes to $$$$$$$ which figure is higher? The money Gore stands to make or the money oil companies stand to lose?

I will agree money is the issue...... but Oil > Gore.

You’re as entitled to your opinion as I am mine - even if yours is 100% false. I’ve stated my opinion, and have seen nothing in the "scientific" propaganda to convince me that I am incorrect.

Flame on. I’m out.
 

hydrogen3

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2013
1,056
0
0
Visit site
Man Made Global Warming is a complete SCAM! The liberal media, left-wing politicians, rabid socialists and nutty environmentalists want us to believe that humans have the ability to go up against the power of Mother Nature.
 

kilofoxtrot

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2011
1,204
36
0
Visit site
Man Made Global Warming is a complete SCAM! The liberal media, left-wing politicians, rabid socialists and nutty environmentalists want us to believe that humans have the ability to go up against the power of Mother Nature.

... you are right, and 911 was an inside job.
 

Just_Me_D

Ambassador Team Leader, Senior Moderator
Moderator
Jan 8, 2012
59,711
634
113
Visit site
Because religious fanatics don't believe in science. They believe the earth is 2,000 old.

1. Define "religious fanatics"
2. What about those who believe certain things in regard to science and certain things in regard to religion, but view the climate change rhetoric as a bunch of crock?
 

hydrogen3

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2013
1,056
0
0
Visit site
... you are right, and 911 was an inside job.

I thought this topic was about global warming and not conspiracy theories?

Here is one for you...Why do Chinese skeptics see global warming as US conspiracy?

''Global warming is a bogus proposition,'' says Zhang Musheng, one of China's most influential intellectuals and a close adviser to a powerful and hawkish general in the People's Liberation Army, Liu Yuan.


Obama and Gore’s Global Warming Conspiracy Revealed


FakeGlobalWarming-610x400.jpg
 

kilofoxtrot

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2011
1,204
36
0
Visit site
I thought this topic was about global warming and not conspiracy theories?

Here is one for you...Why do Chinese skeptics see global warming as US conspiracy?

''Global warming is a bogus proposition,'' says Zhang Musheng, one of China's most influential intellectuals and a close adviser to a powerful and hawkish general in the People's Liberation Army, Liu Yuan.


Obama and Gore’s Global Warming Conspiracy Revealed


View attachment 67489

The same people that are bending you and me over at the gas pump, are the same people you are siding with on global warming.

"...corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.”

Abraham Lincoln
 

Just_Me_D

Ambassador Team Leader, Senior Moderator
Moderator
Jan 8, 2012
59,711
634
113
Visit site
Oil - A good deal of people focus on the money that those who control the oil industry makes. They refuse to see the supply and demand aspect of it. They refuse to acknowledge the benefits that oil has provided for mankind's use. We get angry when the price of gas rises, and accuse the oil companies of taking advantage of the consumer by getting richer off of our dependence of it. Some people have gone out of their way to try and dissuade people from using products made by or is dependent upon oil. Legislation have been passed that have caused certain companies to make changes. There seems to be a push to use what is being touted as "clean energy". Let's say, for the sake of an example, that no one is allowed to use oil / petroleum. What then? Do you not think that there will be those who control our use of products associated with "clean energy". Will those companies not make a fortune off of our dependence of that "clean energy". Do you think that wars will not be fought over it? As I see it, the only thing that will have changed is the wealth shift from oil to "clean energy". We will still have fires causing smoke pollution. We'll still have weapons that could do far more damage than oil could ever do.
 
Last edited:

kilofoxtrot

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2011
1,204
36
0
Visit site
Oil - A good deal of people focus on the money that those who control the oil industry makes. They refuse to see the supply and demand aspect of it. They refuse to acknowledge the benefits that oil had provided for mankind's use. We get angry when the price of gas rises, and accuse the oil companies of taking advantage of the consumer by getting richer off of our dependence of it. Some people have gone out of their way to try an dissuade people from using products made by or dependent on oil. Legislation have been passed that have caused certain companies to make changes. There seems to be a push to use what is being touted as "clean energy". Let's say, for the sake of an example, that no one is allowed to use oil / petroleum. What then? Do you not think that there will be those who control our use of products associated with "clean energy". Will those companies not make a fortune off of our dependence of that "clean energy". Do you think that wars will not be fought over it? As I see it, the only thing that will have changed is the wealth shift from oil to "clean energy". We will still have fires causing smoke pollution. We'll still have weapons that could do far more damage than oil could ever do.

Companies made CFCs (ozone depletion), DDT (almost wiped out the bald eagle), Tabacco (lung cancer and nicotine addiction). All used "discredit the science, disseminate false information, spread confusion, and promote doubt".

Yet the oil industry is altruistic???????
 

Just_Me_D

Ambassador Team Leader, Senior Moderator
Moderator
Jan 8, 2012
59,711
634
113
Visit site
Companies made CFCs (ozone depletion), DDT (almost wiped out the bald eagle), Tabacco (lung cancer and nicotine addiction). All used "discredit the science, disseminate false information, spread confusion, and promote doubt".

Yet the oil industry is altruistic???????

Diseases and natural disasters have wiped out and continues to wipe out people and animals, and people made/make money afterwards. As for trying to discredit science, is it possible that certain people are trying to spread confusion, disseminate false information to the public as well as discredit naysayers through the use of science?
 
Last edited:

kilofoxtrot

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2011
1,204
36
0
Visit site
Diseases and natural disasters have wiped out and continues to wipe out people and animals and people made money afterwards. As for trying discredit science, is it possible that certain people are trying to spread confusion, disseminate false information and discredit naysayers through the use of science?

For what end?
 

Trending Posts

Forum statistics

Threads
260,016
Messages
1,765,330
Members
441,221
Latest member
CØR