Because that part of the story, is immaterial. The blood is on Hillary's hands. Obama could, and should have acted. The house in Benghazi could have been staffed with more people at any time, but the white house wouldn't do it. The State Dep't was aware of what was going on in Benghazi, but did nothing!!! Stop skirting the issue, and answer the question. Would you be o.k. with a member of your family being killed along side the ambassador in Benghazi? How "liberal" would you be then?
I am not ok with it.
Are you ok with Iraq? If there is blood on Hillary's hands, then Bush is covered in blood thousands of times over for starting a conflict on erroneous evidence. Over 5,000 of our brightest and best died for a lie.
Are you ok with a son or a daughter getting killed over false intelligence? Are you?
What absolutely amazes me is that crap always flows up hill for you when look at Benghazi.... but you won't hold and never did hold Bush accountable for the fiasco that is Iraq. I am dumbfounded.
The 9/11 hijackers: 15 of the 19 were citizens of Saudi Arabia. The others were from the United Arab Emirates (2), Egypt and Lebanon. See anyone from Iraq?
Had Obama been president then, you would pivot your position on Iraq.... I guarantee it. Because the right is always right, and the left is always wrong. That is what drives you...... the truth does not.
I could care less if people think Bush is more patrotic than Obama or the "lefties" out there. What good is patriotism if gets people killed for nothing?
"There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people."