kilofoxtrot
Well-known member
So you're saying there was no hate crimes against white Americans ? That's BS.
All it shows is that when there's black on white violence, no hate crime charges are usually brought up. The system is biased.
A US Marine and his friend attacked and beat up by an angry black mob right after Michael Brown shooting. No hate crime charges.
A black boy in Detroit is playing chicken with traffic and gets hit by a pickup truck. The 54 year old white pickup truck driver gets out to check on the boy, is being beaten into a coma by a mob of black men shouting racial slurs (in the presence of many witnesses), spends days in a coma and weeks in a hospital, no hate crime charges are brought up against any of the attackers (there was, however, a charge of "ethnic intimidation" that doesn't equal hate crime).
Shall I go on ? Or will this post be flagged and deleted like my other one ?
There's about 5 times as much black on white violent crime as there's white on black. Google up FBI crime stats. With black community at 13% of the population and white community at 64% (Wiki data for 2010), there's roughly 5 times more whites than blacks and yet the blacks attack whites 5 times more often. Yet, only the whites commit hate crimes ? Come on, don't insult my intelligence.
There's a strong bias in the way our government applies hate crime laws. It's unfair, and unfairness breeds contempt and resentment. As AG Holder had said many times himself. Instead of putting out the fire of racial tensions, the government pours more gasoline into it. Two wrongs don't make it right, you don't fight bias with bias. Won't you agree ?
By the way, it was a black woman that saved the Detroit driver's life. The problem is not with race or skin color. It's with mentality. The only way out of this mess is to try and change the mentality of some people. Both black and white. But for this, the laws should be applied fairly and evenly. Pandering to the hate mongers like Jesse Jackson will produce the opposite effect.
Your two examples (Marine and pickup driver), the crimes committed were not strictly motivated because of race, but rather specific events that invoked the anger. Had the MB shooting or traffic accident not happened, these crimes would not have been committed. That's not the case with hate crimes. Hate is the motivator.
Let me stress that I am in no way condoning these acts. I just don't think they meet the strict definition. IMO
Hate crimes are motivated solely based on a prejudice that occurs when a perpetrator targets a victim because of his or her perceived membership in a certain social group.
In simplistic terms, a hate crime is (excuse me): "Let's go kill/beatup a n----r, or fagot, or etc etc."
Last edited: