- 01-31-2007, 05:54 PM #76
Of course, you know a lot about business. You're the expert in the iPhone forum. And what's this about "moods" dictating your interests. I have provided you with enough. On second thought...Moods? That's a menopausal word. What are you selling pre-paid legal services or AMWAY?
The light is green. I have pulled away from the light. You are sitting in my exhaust. Now you can have the last word and I'll want to get back to talking about iPhone.
- 01-31-2007, 07:15 PM #77
- 01-31-2007, 07:26 PM #78
- 02-01-2007, 09:23 AM #79
LG??? I wasn't aware that they were using a screen-based keyboard. Which model? Is it the $750 model that everybody here at TreoCentral (except for me) compares to the iPhone?
- 02-01-2007, 10:51 AM #80
- 02-01-2007, 12:01 PM #81
- 02-01-2007, 12:11 PM #82
I went to phonescoop.com and couldn't find the LG phone that you might have been alluding to. Do share... I think we're all going to be impressed with the touchscreen technology. You must remember Steve Jobs has been walking around with this thing persecuting it to perfection. I am certain he will spend the next 6 months refining it. I think it will float and not sink.
- 02-01-2007, 12:20 PM #83
- 02-01-2007, 01:23 PM #84
- 02-01-2007, 05:24 PM #87
My question marks are to indicate my puzzlement with you equating the LG to the Treo but yet I can't put the iPhone into the same category as this Treo. So my question remains, "How is the LG better than the iPhone when it doesn't have a keyboard?"
Its amazing how people can associate and project Apple quality onto a device when it uses the same kind of desktop wallpaper.
LG: 3 buttons
Apple: 1 button
LG: screensize is miniscule and surrounded by a huge black bezel
Apple: screensize is huge and surrounded by a thin chrome strip
LG: approximates the shape of an Altoids cannister
Apple: smoothly rounded case design allows it to slip easily in & out of pockets
LG: thicker body
Apple: thinner body
And this is to say nothing of how the phone actually works. ie: LG does not have a multi-touch display, etc, etc.
- 02-01-2007, 05:39 PM #88
Oh noess!! Its 0.5 mm thicker!!! A whole 0.02 inches!!! Yet its smaller and 40% lighter and 17 cubic centimeters smaller, and probably has a higher pixel density than Apple's much vaunted 160 ppi. And heaven forbid you can answer the phone without looking at the screen.
- 02-01-2007, 06:47 PM #90
- 02-01-2007, 08:26 PM #92
- 02-01-2007, 08:27 PM #93
- 02-01-2007, 09:10 PM #94
Iphone 115×61×11.6 mm 135 g
Prada phone 98.8 x 54 x 12 mm 85 g
From screen shots we can see it has e-mail, and some kind of web browser. There is a video of the interface a bit further up. Its still a closed system however.
Re real vs fake buttons, of course I am referring to physical vs virtual buttons.
The Prada phone is nice, the Iphone is probably better in a number of areas, and worse in some, but both would not meet the criteria for most people on this board, despite their good looks.
- 02-02-2007, 05:59 AM #96
- 02-02-2007, 06:24 AM #97
here. It's usable, but awkward due to the user's inability to "feel" the keys...like on the iPhone.
- 02-02-2007, 11:49 AM #98
- 02-02-2007, 11:50 AM #99