Top 10 things to hate about the Apple iPhone

kmrivers

Well-known member
Apr 4, 2006
52
0
0
Visit site
will the iPhone allow codecs apart from those Apple pushes?? One reason i skipped the video iPod...TCMP is great as I can play anything under the sun I've tried sof far...but I guess that's the nerd in me who'll want to put twice as many movies on my harddrive than Apple's DRM will allow! At least they didn't make that mistake with the iPod!

You will get Mpeg4 and H.264. You will just have to reencode your preexisting files to ones the iPhone will play much like the iPod today. So to answer your question, you will be limited to the codecs Apple wants you to use.

Personally I am not a big video person. And when I do watch things. I get them bulk on BT and convert them with a script. There are also iPod version of videos all over the place. I believe google video offers them up like that as well.

I won't buy iTunes stuff, music or video, until they offer lossless tracks and HD video.

From Apple.com (This is for the iPod with Video but I am sure the codecs will stay the same.)

Video formats supported: H.264 video, up to 1.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per sec., Low-Complexity version of the H.264 Baseline Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48 kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats; H.264 video, up to 768 Kbps, 320 by 240 pixels, 30 frames per sec., Baseline Profile up to Level 1.3 with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48 kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats; MPEG-4 video, up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per sec., Simple Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48 kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats
 

surur

Well-known member
Aug 6, 2005
1,412
0
0
Visit site
How about you backup your statement with some details other than "I heard".

Because AJAX is very resource intensive. Doing it on a mobile processor with acceptable speed is also very hard. Its not something that will be helped by a graphics accelerator, but requires a heavy weight browser. And a full features browser with a full DOM is resource intensive.

We shall see, but like most of Job's claims it will probably be bunk too.

Surur
 

Convert#IM

Member
Aug 21, 2006
9
0
0
Visit site
Without 3rd party apps, I wouldn't even consider it. Some of my most used apps are SplashID, Doc2Go, and HandyShopper, which without some equivalent, I wouldn't even consider a switch, no matter how cool.....

....and let's not forget the dictionary - need to look up all those BIG words. :cool:

After all of the discussion about 3rd party apps here at TC, the iPhone will be for the quintessential phone/media user.....and those with deep pockets who can afford another essential device.:p
 

MacUser

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2004
271
0
0
Visit site
I read that there WILL be 3rd party apps...just not open for anyone to write. They will have to go through a screening process for Apple to verify their stability. That actually sounds pretty good, as I like a device that just works.

At least that's what I read...
 

bruckwine

Well-known member
Nov 25, 2006
323
0
0
Visit site
You will get Mpeg4 and H.264. You will just have to reencode your preexisting files to ones the iPhone will play much like the iPod today. So to answer your question, you will be limited to the codecs Apple wants you to use.

Personally I am not a big video person. And when I do watch things. I get them bulk on BT and convert them with a script. There are also iPod version of videos all over the place. I believe google video offers them up like that as well.

I won't buy iTunes stuff, music or video, until they offer lossless tracks and HD video.

From Apple.com (This is for the iPod with Video but I am sure the codecs will stay the same.)

my dear kmrivers have you ever ripped video much less recode it? I have and believe me if it's one thign I appreciate it's progs like BSplayer, and media player alternative that play almost anything! I think this has ALWAYS been a problem with both apple and microsoft - ppl using their players have to download codecs hacks etc..but to each their own but I can appreciate TCMP for their integration of all codecs...
 

Convert#IM

Member
Aug 21, 2006
9
0
0
Visit site
I read that there WILL be 3rd party apps...just not open for anyone to write. They will have to go through a screening process for Apple to verify their stability. That actually sounds pretty good, as I like a device that just works.

At least that's what I read...

Link? ????????????????
 

MacUser

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2004
271
0
0
Visit site
I read it while at the Apple store this week. I'll see if I can find it...I should have emailed the link to myself :/
 

archie

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
532
0
0
Visit site
surur said:
Show me a dumb phone without at least voice tags.

Surur
fantastic point.
iPods have incorporated voice tags for the last 2 years. A person would be stupid to think that they will suddenly stop supporting this. Especially now with the ever increasing interoperatability (not sure if that is a word) of iPods and vehicles. AND NOW with Bluetooth built into the iPhone, it should prove to be of even more use.

I can't wait for Apple to reveal there full hand in regards to the iPhone. I can't wait for Apple to unveil Leopard and its iPhone level of support and interoperability (like maybe funtioning as a remote control to Apple TV). I can't wait for Apple to reveal the additional peripherals they have worked up for the iPhone. I can't wait to see the bevy of additional perpherals from third party manufacturers.
 

archie

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
532
0
0
Visit site
What? No response from suror.

The sky is falling, the sky is falling!


OK, how 'bout this comment of yours:
kmrivers said:
How about you backup your statement with some details other than "I heard".
Because AJAX is very resource intensive. Doing it on a mobile processor with acceptable speed is also very hard. Its not something that will be helped by a graphics accelerator, but requires a heavy weight browser. And a full features browser with a full DOM is resource intensive.

We shall see, but like most of Job's claims it will probably be bunk too.

Surur
Oh no, "I Fear, I am so Uncertain, I highly Doubt I will get the iPhone knowing what surur knows".

BULL****!!
 

Slingbox

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2006
59
0
0
Visit site
Things I hate about the iphone
It,s over rated in no ones hand
edge speeds are a killer:thumbsdn:

Look forward to the palm sherlock to be released in June by Sprint.linux OS with that pretty (intel chip=wimax speeds-We all can prey)Moto and samsung are locked in on that intel chip but we may be suprised.
 

archie

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
532
0
0
Visit site
Because AJAX is very resource intensive. Doing it on a mobile processor with acceptable speed is also very hard. Its not something that will be helped by a graphics accelerator, but requires a heavy weight browser. And a full features browser with a full DOM is resource intensive.

We shall see, but like most of Job's claims it will probably be bunk too.

Surur
Hey, what do you know; look what I found:

Article
An iPhone Performance Secret: LLVM
Thursday, February 1st, 2007 at 2:50 PM - by John Martellaro

Apple has found a way to achieve amazing graphics speed in a shirt pocket device, the iPhone, by using a special form of code optimization called "Low Level Virtual Machine," (LLVM) according to graphics and algorithms specialist Charles Ying.

Mr. Ying wrote Thursday that Apple has taken the approach of using its expertise in Mac OS X, OpenGL, and code optimization via LLVM in the development in the iPhone.

Small personal electronics that can fit in your pocket are always short of the electrical power required for fast video processing. And yet Apple has demonstrated very impressive graphics capabilities with the iPhone. The key is extensive code optimization at every stage, from the CPU to the graphics system, from compile to runtime, and that can be done with LLVM.

Because the iPhone is running "OS X," a variant of Mac OS X, Apple can take advantage of their expertise in OpenGL graphics used by Mac OS X to achieve the amazing scrolling feature and finger resizing of graphics of the iPhone. But any interpreted interface, like OpenGL would have to be highly optimized to achieve that kind of performance in a small device. With LLVM, the programmer can enable program optimization in every realm: compile, link, and even at runtime.

Apple has taken several steps to achieve this. Apple has quietly contributed ARM enhancements to LLVM. Secondly, LLVM has been integrated with Apple's primary compiler in Xcode, called gcc.

When all is said and done, Apple has achieved a highly optimized OS X and Open GL code base that can exploit Core Animation on an ARM processor.

This is very likely why Apple chose to use "OS X" in the iPhone and how Apple can achieve amazing graphics in a shirt pocket device with limited electrical power.
 

Slingbox

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2006
59
0
0
Visit site
So you have proof the Sherlock is coming? What're the details?

Brighthand
Is This Hawkins' Pet Project?

Over the past year or so, Jeff Hawkins, Palm's co-founder, has made several references to his company's plans to create a mysterious third product category that's neither a handheld or smartphone.

Not surprisingly, Engadget's article has created speculation that the Sherlock will be this device.

Of course, it's also entirely possible that this device, if real, will simply be an updated version of one of Palm's current smartphones, especially as this information is supposedly coming from a wireless carrier.

Only time can reveal more information on the Sherlock.

Hints and Suggestions

When asked for details on this mysterious product category during his interview last year with the Portland Business Journal, all Hawkins would say was:

I always think of mobile computing as personal computing. This long-term vision has led us through everything -- first the organizers and now through the smart phone space. It's like everything a personal computer is. Continue down that path. What are the implications of a world where everyone has a super high-speed Internet connection in their pocket and many gigabytes of storage, super-fast processors, audio, visual and multimedia? What are the consequences of that? How will that change computing when you have all that stuff available to you all the time? I try to think into the future. That's how we come up with new products. So I'm not going to tell you what it is, but it's following the consequences of mobile computing.

_________________________________________________________________

Software Everyware-David Beers
Sunday, January 28, 2007
The rebirth of the Palm OS brand
I wasn't surprised to see a few shrill articles about the death of the Palm OS this week. The ten-year-old mobile operating system has been "dying" for most of its life in the assessment of the technical media—at least dating back to when the first Pocket PC devices hit the market in 2000. But the original PDA OS still dominates the handheld device market and has in recent years occupied a small but high-profile beachhead on the global smartphone market, thanks to the popularity of the Palm Treo. Still, when its owner ACCESS announced it was renaming the venerable Palm OS Garnet to "Garnet OS" it seemed even to many fair-minded observers to have suffered a humiliating blow.

At the risk of sounding absurdly optimistic in the face of the declining PDA market and the Palm OS's beleaguered status in the tough smartphone market, I am going on record saying that its renaming is actually something of a milestone in the rebirth of the "Palm" brand. To understand why this could be so you need to know a bit of history.

To start with, while ACCESS has been decried for the renaming, it wasn't actually something they had a choice about. In May of 2005 PalmSource sold the right to the previously shared Palm brand to then-PalmOne, and agreed to phase out its use of the name in all its products within four years. PalmOne immediately changed its name back to Palm Inc. and it was only a matter of time before ACCESS—party to the agreement by dint of its acquisition of PalmSource—would begin the process of removing the Palm name from all of its products. When PalmSource was renamed ACCESS last October this was symbolic of the integration of parent and subsidiary, but it was also the first step toward compliance with that two-year old agreement. Changing "Palm OS Garnet" to "Garnet OS" is just the next step. Eventually ACCESS products like Palm Desktop will have to be renamed or replaced as well.

What's more interesting is what the change means for Palm. As has been widely publicized, Palm reacquired from ACCESS the right to use and develop the Garnet OS source code in pretty much any way it choses as long as backward compatibility is maintained, as established by a mutually agreed upon test suite. Less publicized is the fact that Palm is actually exempt from having to use the name Garnet OS in any products it releases with this OS. In explaining this deal with Palm, ACCESS stated:

Under terms of the agreement, we have given Palm the right to use either "Palm OS by ACCESS" or the product's new name... when referring to the operating system licensed with this new agreement.
So from Palm's perspective this renaming exercise by ACCESS would appear to mean next to nothing.

But appearances can be deceiving. As I've mentioned several times before, Palm's reacquistion of the Garnet source code was not just so Palm didn't have to depend on ACCESS to make minor tweaks and bug fixes. The $44M agreement included concessions by ACCESS that give Palm "the right to use Palm OS Garnet in whole, or in part, in any product from Palm and together with any other system technologies." Palm's press release about the agreement was a bit more definite about what this meant:

Palm has secured an expansion of its existing patent license from ACCESS to cover all current and future Palm products, regardless of the underlying operating system. [emphasis mine]

I've gone into some detail in several other posts about the evidence that Palm needed this agreement to enable it to develop it's own Linux-based successor to the Palm OS, apart from that being developed by ACCESS. If I'm right about this, what makes the renaming of Palm OS Garnet so interesting, is that it actually clears the way for Palm to give the name "Palm OS" to its next-generation operating system. Palm owns the brand, it owns its OS, and as of this week no other company will be able to use the name Palm OS.

The Palm brand had become quite a mess in the last few years, what with the ill-fated PalmOne/PalmSource split and the subsequent buyout of PalmSource, but since Ed Colligan took the helm at Palm he's done a great job in putting the brand back together again. More than just the brand, he has hired back many of the original developers of the Palm OS and regained the right to build the next generation of the Palm OS. From where I stand it looks like this project has been under way for at least a couple of years, and I expect we'll be hearing an announcement about a modernized but Garnet-compatible "Palm System 7" (or some such) within the next few months.


Sprint 07 roadmap

http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/18/hands-on-with-sprints-1h-07-roadmap/
 

surur

Well-known member
Aug 6, 2005
1,412
0
0
Visit site
So this OpenGL accelerator is going to accelerate JAVASCRIPT? I dint think you realize how many orders of magnitude faster desktop processors are than ARM processors. BTW, thank you for confirming that the Iphone runs on ARM. That firmly brackets the maximum performance of the Iphone.

BTW - last we heard the Iphone has no voice control. Are you assuming again?

Surur
 

archie

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
532
0
0
Visit site
So this OpenGL accelerator is going to accelerate JAVASCRIPT? I dint think you realize how many orders of magnitude faster desktop processors are than ARM processors. BTW, thank you for confirming that the Iphone runs on ARM. That firmly brackets the maximum performance of the Iphone.
Did you not read the article? I can't believe how unbelievably stupid you sound when you are trying to be a smart-a$$ in dodging the issue and pretending my response doesn't address your questions, or in this case, your false assumptions.

BTW - last we heard the Iphone has no voice control. Are you assuming again?

Surur
Apparently you missed it the first, second and third time I have mentioned it here in this part of the forum, so I'll say it again. The iPod CURRENTLY has support for voice tags. The iPhone WILL have support for voice tags.
 

surur

Well-known member
Aug 6, 2005
1,412
0
0
Visit site
Did you not read the article? I can't believe how unbelievably stupid you sound when you are trying to be a smart-a$$ in dodging the issue and pretending my response doesn't address your questions, or in this case, your false assumptions.

Archie, I forgive you for not reading the whole thread in the rush to shoot your mouth off, but its about editing documents using AJAX based applications. You are the one who is not answering the problem. Explain to me again how accelerating graphics is going to speed up pagination?

Apparently you missed it the first, second and third time I have mentioned it here in this part of the forum, so I'll say it again. The iPod CURRENTLY has support for voice tags. The iPhone WILL have support for voice tags.

Sorry, I missed the post where you said Apple gave you an IPhone. They must have, because the people who have actually used the phone say:


Can you tell us what other features the IPhone have. It must be nice having all that insider information, and not just be ***uming stuff.

Surur
 

Latest posts

Trending Posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
260,297
Messages
1,766,245
Members
441,232
Latest member
Thomas Woods