As the title states what media source or sources do you think has constantly and still bashes Apple and Why? What do they have to gain by doing so?
The biggest bashers of Apple is Google Plus users.
Sent from my [Gold] iPhone 5S
The biggest bashers of Apple is Google Plus users.
Sent from my [Gold] iPhone 5S
Personally I think it starts with the other Big Smartphone companies IMO. .
IMO you should rephrase your topic. I don't consider "other Big Smartphone companies" or Google to be media sources.
The media source that stands to gain the most from bashing Apple would be the one who has the most anti-Apple readers. Anti-Apple content would likely mean greater click-through and greater advertising revenue as a result. So along those lines...Android Central would have quite a bit to gain by posting anti-Apple stories.
Apple bashing is a business these days. As they say don't hate the Haters but you can't help it when the war is taken to the one group of people who it will never effect and that is the loyal Apple people no matter what Apple builds and prices at will remain loyal because of the quality and customer service.All of them really...Apple bashing has become almost a business these days, so anyone who does it garners attention, which is the most important tool within the media.
They all have marketing and advertising departments don't they? To me that makes them Media Sources. I don't dispute your point of vue. That is mine.IMO you should rephrase your topic. I don't consider "other Big Smartphone companies" or Google to be media sources.
The media source that stands to gain the most from bashing Apple would be the one who has the most anti-Apple readers. Anti-Apple content would likely mean greater click-through and greater advertising revenue as a result. So along those lines...Android Central would have quite a bit to gain by posting anti-Apple stories.
This is what I responded to right or wrong and my own opinion... This is what I wrote to another response:I feel the same way about the definition of media sources. Neither corporations or Google (pretty much a corporation) falls under that category, to me. Media sources/companies who are public to open trading, yeah.
I wasn't disputing your point of view or trying to bash it in any way at all or being facetious. Just disagreed with what qualifies as media sources. Pretty much Apple bashing, what Sean pointed out, is what seems to gain readers/viewership nowadays. Gaining more of those eyes and ears makes for more revenue in advertising. If there are some advertisers directly related to gaining something by Apple stock taking a hit, that's another thing to gain, too.This is what I responded to right or wrong and my own opinion... This is what I wrote to another response:
They all have marketing and advertising departments don't they? To me that makes them Media Sources. I don't dispute your point of vue. That is mine.
No need to even say what you did because I never took it that way and tend to agree with you. I agree with many of the things or points of view that Sean points out and hope he did not take my comment the wrong way. He would tell me if he did. Anyway no harm - No foul my friend.I wasn't disputing your point of view or trying to bash it in any way at all or being facetious. Just disagreed with what qualifies as media sources. Pretty much Apple bashing, what Sean pointed out, is what seems to gain readers/viewership nowadays. Gaining more of those eyes and ears makes for more revenue in advertising. If there are some advertisers directly related to gaining something by Apple stock taking a hit, that's another thing to gain, too.
I hope you did not take my comment the wrong way. I figured if you did I would have heard it by now...lolAll of them really...Apple bashing has become almost a business these days, so anyone who does it garners attention, which is the most important tool within the media.
I'm a google plus user...
Sent from my iPhone 5S or 5th gen iPod Touch using Tapatalk
They all have marketing and advertising departments don't they? To me that makes them Media Sources. I don't dispute your point of vue. That is mine.