This thread is a takeoff from another thread where a similar discussion was beginning to take place, but was a little off-topic. Having said that, do you think it is best for a kid under the age of 18 to have a smartphone or a non-smartphone?
I say no phone but that's just not how things work today. My kids use their phones during class at school. If they don't have a phone or tablet, they have to use one of the school's devices and no one wants to be "that kid". I think they have access to way too much way to early these days.
I say no phone but I do understand that kids have extra- curricular activities and that parents can't be there 24/7 so a normal cellphone can suffice. Now if they're 15+ and want a smartphone they can work and get one and pay the bill. Teach 'em some responsibility and that its a luxury item and not a necessity
I don't have a problem with that at all, but that's not the same as determining which is best for them in today's society. My adult kids started at with pre-paid phones. My youngest is far more responsible at age 10 than they were at age 12 or 13 when they got their prepaid phones. They hate the fact that he has a smartphone at his current age, but not because of the fact that it's beneficial to not only him, but to me and his mom, but because they had to wait until they were a bit older before getting a phone of any kind.
This thread is a takeoff from another thread where a similar discussion was beginning to take place, but was a little off-topic. Having said that, do you think it is best for a kid under the age of 18 to have a smartphone or a non-smartphone?
It doesn't depend on age but more on psychological needs of the child.
I'm not sure I follow you here. How does having tech relate to the psychological needs of a child?