This continues to be where I just get baffled at your responses..."At the expense of"...how do you figure? Did I prevent that person from getting up early or staying up to pre-order the device to get it on launch day? Did I prevent that person from getting in line at their local Apple store early to get an iPhone on the release day?
How do you assign blame to the person who DID do these things because another person decided NOT to do those things? In what reality is that logic sound?
Let's make a hypothetical situation here...let's say there is a delicious pizza joint locally that starts serving pizza at 3pm, and serves it until their pizza is gone. Now lets say that every day, a line forms 2 hours before the pizza place opens, and based on the line, EVERY DAY, pizza is usually completely gone by 5pm (but more will be available the next day in the same scenario). There is a 2 slice limit to what each person can buy.
Now today, I got up at 1pm and went and got in line...I was one of the first people in line and I got my 2 slices when they started making pizza. I go and sit down at the table but by now it's 5pm and there are no more pizzas for anyone walking up...so someone starts offering to buy my slices for twice what I paid for them. I'm eating one of them, but decide I'm not hungry enough to eat the second one, so I sell it to this person for what he offers. This person gets a slice of the delicious pizza, didn't have to wait in line for it and got it after the stock of pizza was completely gone for that day.
How the hell do you figure I just did something wrong? This person just paid me extra for the convenience of not having to wait in line that day for pizza he wanted...should I have simply let him buy the pizza for what I paid even though I put in the work to get it? Should I have sacrificed the extra piece that i MIGHT have wanted in the idea that someone who showed up later might want a piece without having to make the sacrifice or time or effort that I did?
In what world is that the way things work in reality? In what world is it "wrong" to charge people for convenience? Because I'm pretty sure that is how our entire way of consumer life is defined.
This has become so redundant it's hilarious...but I'm going to continue to retort to this in the same exact way because it is simply baffling to me that a person, even ONE person, sits and thinks that the world owes them something to the extent that they would call the free market economy practices "wrong".
I think the problem you have is that you assign things you don't like as being "wrong", when in reality, they aren't "wrong" at all. I mean I don't LIKE the fact that living in the city costs more than living in the suburbs...but by no means do I think the people charging more for a mortgage on my condo downtown are "wrong" because some guy got a 5 bedroom house in the suburbs for the same price.
(Sean knows I can't resist)
To make the analogy work, let's make it a new special pizza that once they run out of the first day's supply won't be available for weeks and months.
Let's say that all the people in line are not going to eat the pizza but instead go on ebay and mark it up.
Let's also say that there are only a half a dozen places that have even attempted to make these smart pizzas and this new one is truly the first one to get it right.
Let's also say that this causes a frenzy that makes some write bad reviews about the shop, others to avoid it and many look down on the sheep for paying for the pizza on ebay.
Alright now we are on the same page with the analogy.
Sean keeps saying I ignore his questions and haven't explained how scalping is taking advantage.
Here's the problem: with the pizza being pricey enough, the very limited supply, and the excitement of the launch has attracted scalpers. Scalpers understand how they can take advantage even if Sean doesn't. So they stack the line so only scalpers get pizza.
That is NOT how the pizza shop wants to do business. They intended to sell their pizza direct to customers. But instead there is someone in their way exploiting the excitement they have created with their customers for profit.
Now back to the watch launch. The scalpers weren't that effective this time. I see the worst case scenario. There is evidence for this looking at phone launches. Listen to the imore crew talk about reporters who have interviewed the people on a line and had to ask a lot of people before finding an actual end customer.
Sean, now do you get it? You don't have to agree but now can you admit that I have a point of view and maybe even a basis for it?
BTW: I have a 4/24 ship date. I don't expect any favors from anyone. I also don't choose to interfere with others. What the heck is wrong with that? It was probably useless name calling for humor but I bet some cheered and said - yeah so entitled.
Sent from my iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk